Another popular theory I want to touch on is "streaks". People like to see patterns where none exist. They also like to look at some statistics but not others. Let's take an example. What are the chances of rolling 98 or higher? Simple: 3%. What are the chances of rolling 98 or higher 5 times in a row? About 1 in 4.1 million. If you stop there you would think that if you saw somebody roll 98+ 5 times in a row, they *must* be cheating! But let's not stop there. How many random rolls are there each night? Many millions. So what are the chances that a noticable number of people did indeed roll 98+ 5 times in a row? Virtually guaranteed.
另外一个非常流行的理论我想提及的是"特征倾向".兄弟们总喜欢去找一些根本就不存在的规律.他们也喜欢片面的根据一些统计数据而且全部进行推论.让咱们来举个例.ROLL到98及以上的机率为多少? 很简单,3%呗. 连续ROLL到98及以上5次的机率为多少? 大概410万分之一. 如果看到这里你就停下然后你很可能会在你看见某人ROLL连续到98+ 5次的时候认为他"绝对"是在作弊! 但是等等! 让咱们想想每一晚有多少次随机ROLL? 那是N百万呀.. 因而,有相当数量的人能连续5次ROLL到98+的机率为多少? 实际上还是可以非常十分相当的肯定这种可能性是有的啥.
It is true that we are dealing with pseudo-random numbers as opposed to true randoms. It is also true that all pseudo-random number generators do have a pattern to them; they will eventually repeat themselves. You need to keep in mind that their periods (number of iterations before they repeat) are very long. It varies by algorithm, but the length of the period is one of the key attributes of any good random number generator. Each server process has it's own unique random number generator and everyone being served by a process is sharing that generator. So while the numbers can not be truly random, we have done what we can to make them as random as possible.
我们在使用与真随机数相对应的伪随机数生成器是真的. 所有的伪随机数生成器都有规律可循也是真的；它们最终会自我重复。你需要记住的一点就是他们的周期（在它们重复前的反复次数）是非常长的。 根据算法不同而不一样，但是，变化周期时间是任何好的随机数生成器的一项关键属性。每个服务器进程都有其独立的随机数生成器，每个使用该服务器进程的玩家皆共用这个生成器。因此当数字并不能真正意义上随机时，我们会保证让他们尽可能的随机。
At the first reports of suspected roll hacking, we did a review of the loot rolling code and found no vulnerabilities. We still decided to go ahead and log all loot rolls so that we can address suspected roll hacks with real information. Since that time we have checked these logs against claims of roll hacking and have as yet found nothing to substantiate any of the claims. In some cases we have seen direct evidence that the claims were false.
自第一例怀疑的ROLL破解事件以来，我们进行了一次装备拾取ROLL代码的检查，并没有发现缺陷。我们仍决定继续对所有装备拾取ROLL的数据进行记录这样我们就可以通过收集的实时数据对此类怀疑的ROLL破解问题进行解决。由那时起，我们对所有举报的ROLL破解对应我们记录的ROLL数据进行了检查，到目前为止，并没有发现此类举报相关的实质性证据，某些情况下，通过一些直接证据，我们发现许多举报本身就是虚假的。
In summary, there are no known roll hacks. We will continue to monitor and investigate these issues.
一句话加一个字，目前为止没有什么所谓的ROLL破解。我们会非常NB非常娴熟的继续监测和调查类似问题。
谢谢CCTV，MTV和the 9.
OVER.
上一页 [1] [2]
